Re: ATTN: Request for moving SLFS discussion
Ian Molton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Dragon Roost |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 13:28:07 +0100 Miguel Bazdresch <[email protected]> wrote: > According to the lfs-security description on > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/mail.html > > SLFS looks like a perfectly appropriate subject for the list. > > May I suggest adding the word "SLFS" to your filters? Miguel! thats unusually condescending from you... are you alright? If you really do believe what you wrote then I'll suggest we create lfs.security.alerts then. personally I think a slfs.* hierarchy would be better, in keeping with the *lfs.* hierarchies we have already. -- Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with ketchup. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page