Re: ATTN: Request for moving SLFS discussion
Bill's LFS Login <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Ian Molton wrote: > On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 13:28:07 +0100 > Miguel Bazdresch <[email protected]> wrote: > > ><snip> > personally I think a slfs.* hierarchy would be better, in keeping with the *lfs.* hierarchies we have already. I know that sometimes G. gets swamped by the volume of his mail. I've posted to him suggesting at least an slfs list to allow the folks a place to do their organization and preliminary planning. If the effort appears headed towards long-term viability, they could suggest, and I would support the org as you suggest. But we need to get Archaic back in there too. I don't know if he got side-tracked or is just monitoring to see what's up. -- NOTE: I'm on a new ISP, if I'm in your address book ... Bill Maltby lfsbillATearthlinkDOTnet Fix line above & use it to mail me direct. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page