Re: SLFS book chapter proposals

Archaic <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.security
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 12:50:36AM +0200, Christos Gioran wrote:
> 
> The question is whether we have the task to teach readers all there is to know 
> about security and implementations thereof, or strictly building a secure 
> system. I do not have a problem with the former, but we broaden the subject 
> awfuly too much. I think putting in some pointers and suggested reading 
> should be enough.

That is the grey area that will cause the most debate. I don't think it
should be strictly building a system, but I also know that many things
have been suggested that are outside of the overall scope. Many more
things may be in the scope, but daunting and overwhelming. We must pace
ourselves if we are to accomplish much.

-- 
Archaic

Government should be weak, amateurish and ridiculous. At present, it
fulfills only a third of the role.

- Edward Abbey

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.