Re: SLFS book chapter proposals

ashes <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Dec 2003 03:49:24 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.security
Organization Utopia Inc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
If it helps, I'm not opposed to following LFS-5.0. It is already stabilized so 
it would be easier to work with. I don't want to hinder community support for 
SLFS just to use bleeding edge development (it can be an slfs hint though). I 
hope this helps resolve one issue.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page