Re: SLFS book chapter proposals

On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 03:49:24AM -0500, ashes wrote:
> If it helps, I'm not opposed to following LFS-5.0. It is already stabilized so 
> it would be easier to work with. I don't want to hinder community support for 
> SLFS just to use bleeding edge development (it can be an slfs hint though). I 
> hope this helps resolve one issue.

The big debate is whether to use LFS-5 or current CVS. CVS is a moving
target, but if we did it all to 5.0 and 5.1 or later is released, we
have to do all the catching up at one time. Quite frankly, I never
figured anything would be ready while lfs-5.0 is still current, so my
vote would be to follow cvs, though I'm not deadset on way or the other.

Opinions?

-- 
Archaic

You [should] not examine legislation in the light of the benefits it
will convey if properly administered, but in the light of the wrongs it
would do and the harm it would cause if improperly administered

- Lyndon Johnson, former President of the U.S.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page