Re: [PATCH] [round 3] Upstreaming Debian patches
Christian Seiler <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:47:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lib.dietlibc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/06/2016 02:18 PM, Felix von Leitner wrote: > OK, I think I imported them all. Please check if I missed something! Many, many thanks! I just did a CVS checkout, and you did appear to apply the mips64 and ppc64le patches, but forgot to cvs add the 'mips64' and 'ppc64le' directories. I'd would be great if you could add those, otherwise ppc64le and mips64 support is kind-of incomplete. ;-) Additionally, you didn't forget that one, but I found an additional (quite embarrassing) bug in my aarch64 port. (fopen() didn't work, neither did fork() when linking against -lpthread.) I've uploaded an additional patch here (not part of the tarball): https://iwakd.de/dietlibc-patches/view/B-NewPorts.d/0031-aarch64-additional-fixes.diff Download link: https://iwakd.de/dietlibc-patches/download/B-NewPorts.d/0031-aarch64-additional-fixes.diff > Also I noted there is a 0028 and a 0030 but no 0029. What happened to > 0029? :) You already applied it ;-), it was this one: https://iwakd.de/dietlibc-patches/view/J-General.d/0029-cross-compiler-mangling.diff Would be great if you could apply patch #31 and add the missing mips64 and ppc64le directories. Once that's done, I'll rebase the Debian version on a CVS snapshot to see if there is some additional fallout from that - but this should be it in terms of non-Debian- specific patches. Again, many thanks! Hopefully this is the last time there's such a large batch of changes from my side. We do now run quite a few unit tests during build time on all architectures though, so the most egregious things have now hopefully been caught already. ;-) Regards, Christian