Larry Platzek [email protected]

Larry:

	I tried to reply to you, but got this strange mail error.
Seems like your mailer (mail.inow.com) doesn't like the receipent
([email protected]).

NOTE:
=====
> ... while talking to mail.inow.com.:
> >>> RCPT To:<[email protected]>
> <<< 553 5.3.0 <[email protected]>... Rejected - see http://relays.osirusoft.com/
> 550 5.1.1 [email protected]... User unknown







Forwarded message:
> From alby  Fri Feb 14 13:41:14 2003
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:41:14 -0500
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]>
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> 
> This is a MIME-encapsulated message
> 
> --h1EIfEZ30262.1045248074/empire.org
> 
> The original message was received at Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:41:13 -0500
> from alby@localhost
> 
>    ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> [email protected]
>     (reason: 553 5.3.0 <[email protected]>... Rejected - see http://relays.osirusoft.com/)
> 
>    ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> ... while talking to mail.inow.com.:
> >>> RCPT To:<[email protected]>
> <<< 553 5.3.0 <[email protected]>... Rejected - see http://relays.osirusoft.com/
> 550 5.1.1 [email protected]... User unknown








> From: Alby <alby>
> Subject: Re: [LRP] Rate
> To: [email protected] (Larry Platzek)
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:41:13 -0500 (EST)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	I searched the knowledge base and couldn't find anything.
> They have a blurb on load balancing, but I don't see anything about
> controlling bandwidth based on what traffic comes from the Application Layer.
> Do you have a link? I run Bering at home and don't recall any reference
> to bandwidth controls. Let me know what you find. :)'
> 
> -Alby
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > I suggest looking at Bering on the LEAF site.
> > http://leaf.sf.net/
> > Bering does have tc which should do Throttling Control. I have not used
> > but othhers on LEAF list have.
> > 
> > Larry Platzek  [email protected]
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Alby wrote:
> > 
> > > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 07:57:07 -0500
> > > From: Alby <[email protected]>
> > > To: "Jeroen Steenhuis (Dutch Plating Power BV)"
> > >     <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [LRP] Rate
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   That isn't possible unless its done from an application layer
> > > that limits the download bandwidth used. Unless something has
> > > changed, I don't know of any router which can tier bandwidth
> > > based on what port a packet is using. Bandwidth can be tiered
> > > per connection and/or network so that users on a certain network
> > > are capped as a whole. Even so, I don't know if a LRP router can
> > > do any of that.
> > >
> > >  Sorry Jeroen, about the best you can do is crack heads on downloaders
> > > if they are hogging your bandwidth. Otherwise the only other possible
> > > scenerio would be to setup a network design where each workstation
> > > had its own router, and that router had a frame-relay pvc connection
> > > back to a gateway router. With that, you could limit the "overall"
> > > bandwidth per machine so that you allow enough to surf, but not
> > > enough to eat up the network's total bandwidth. Maybe allocate
> > > 10k per machine or some fraction of your total bandwidth. The down
> > > side to that is amount of hardware you'll need to deploy. And I don't
> > > know if an LRP router could run different protocols like FrameRelay
> > > since the interface cards are ethernet. Frame-Relay over Ethernet,
> > > I don't think its possible.
> > >
> > >  Before I start thumbing through my CCNA book and typing up more
> > > jibberish, the overall answer I believe is (No).
> > >
> > > -Alby
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jeroen Steenhuis (Dutch Plating Power BV)"
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:27 AM
> > > Subject: [LRP] Rate
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Is it possible to give download processes less priority (bandwidh) then
> > > > > somebody who is browsing the internet?
> > > > >
> > > > > People here are getting angry if sombody downloads a file, browsing gets
> > > > > very slow...
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > linux-router maillist  -  [email protected]
> > > > http://www.linuxrouter.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-router
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-router maillist  -  [email protected]
> > > http://www.linuxrouter.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-router
> > >
> > 
> 
> 
> --h1EIfEZ30262.1045248074/empire.org--
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-router maillist  -  [email protected]
http://www.linuxrouter.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-router