Re: DLINK DWL-122 on ARM platform not stable, why?
"Tiger.Yin" <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:05:04 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.linux-wlan.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you, Solomon! The driver version I tried is 0.2.2, 0.2.3 and 0.2.5. Firmware information like below: ident: nic: id=0x8026 1.0.0 ident: pri: id=0x15 1.1.3 ident: sta: id=0x15 1.7.1 But I couldn't find suitable firmware for my dongle because I found no firmware is used for nic id=0x8026. I'm not sure if those firmware could used on my dongle? I tried WEP with "sharedkey", but the result is the same. So will you please give me some idea on firmware updating? Thanks a lot! Tiger.Yin On 9/21/06, Solomon Peachy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 04:59:42PM +0800, Tiger.Yin wrote: > > The dlink dwl-122 dongle i used on my ARM(XScale270) platform seemed > > not stable, the linux is 2.6.10. USB driver used OHCI mode. > > What driver version? What firmware version? > > > Sometime, this error appeared: > > skb_p80211_to_ether: OTHER frame too large (-4 > 1500) > > This is interesting. > > > 2. Opensystem with WEP(64bits) > > When i set WEP(64bits) on AP, the dongle also could connect to the AP, > > and i could see the dongle's information on AP's trace. But even i set > > IP address and route of the dongle, no host could i ping to. Some > > error info like this: > > ... ... > > message=lnxreq_autojoin > > ssid='mobot' > > authtype=opensystem > > resultcode=success > > /usr/lib # linkstatus=CONNECTED > > Are you sure you don't need 'authtype=sharedkey'? > > Is the WEP key known to be identical/correct? > > Finally, despite many heroic efforts from many contributors > (Especially Chris Rankin), prism2 USB hardware is inherently > flaky. Newer firmawre helps a lot, as do newer driver revs. > > - Solomon > -- > Solomon Peachy [email protected] > AbsoluteValue Systems http://www.linux-wlan.com > 721-D North Drive +1 (321) 259-0737 (office) > Melbourne, FL 32934 +1 (321) 259-0286 (fax) > > >