Re: Linux Standardized Desktop Tools
Matt Taggart <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
cc'd lsb-futures Per Arneng writes... [snip] > PROBLEM: > > * Lack of a set of basic graphical tools (ex: File management , Process=20 > control , Control panel) that are consistent on all distributions. > > SOLUTION: > > * A set of GUI design guidelines and reference software these utilities. > > These utilities can be implemented in GNOME, KDE or any other GUI toolki= > t as=20 > long as they have the same look & feel. They should not have to look the = > same=20 > in color or theme but the buttons should be in the same place and perform= > the=20 > same functionality.=20 Maybe there's a translation problem, but I think there are two problems you are trying to address here, 1.) Consistant look and feel of applications 2.) Common set of user or administration tools right? The soon to be formed "Desktop" standards group has also identified #1 and will be trying help solve it though standardization of GUI toolkits and "Look and Feel" and "Usability" guides. I expect that some time in the next month or so this group will have a mailing list and start having regular meetings. We don't have an answer for #2 yet. The LSB is a development standard, one that specifies what things developers can expect to find on the systems they deploy their applications on. In some cases this covers commands, but only because they might be needed by an application. In order to solve #2 I think we would need to create an additional "Linux Administration" or "Linux End User" standard. I think this is a really good idea and at some point I'd like to start/help with such an effort. Both the Desktop group and any other potential groups will be incubated in the lsb-futures group until they're ready to spin-off on their own. Brainstorming of this type can be sent to [email protected] in the future. Thanks, -- Matt Taggart Linux and Open Source Lab [email protected] Hewlett-Packard