Re: plugins
Bill Nottingham <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:15:18 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Darrin Thompson ([email protected]) said: > >Does this imply actual standardization of the browser first? Because, > >well, without that, I don't see the point. > > Yes. Which requires specifying: - commandline interface - browser type (mozilla-oldschool? thunderbird? other mozilla-based?) And what about a Konqeror shop? - compiler ABI (2.95? 2.96? 3.0? 3.2? 3.4?) I see way too many variables here that will change what the 'correct' value is over time (browser type, C++ ABI) to really make standardization useful. What gain is there to specifying the web browser interface? Bill