Re: RE: [Lsb-cvslog] si/build/patches coreutils-i18n.patch, NONE, 1.1 coreutils-i18n-sort.patch, NONE, 1.1
Marvin Heffler <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:48:35 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.implementation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFE1ADBF17.84377520-ON86256EB0.00567C65-86256EB0.0056A585@us.ibm.com> |
I added the patches since they are being used by the distros and it cleans up the si test results very nicely. It's still a good policy to avoid using patches that haven't been accepted by the upstream, but I would like to see the si have much cleaner results. We can always back out the patches if the consensus is that we shouldn't do it. Regards, Marvin Heffler Linux Standard Base IBM Linux Technology Center 11400 Burnet Road, Zip 905-7A017 Austin, TX 78758 (512) 838-0953 T/L 678-0953 [email protected] wrote on 06/11/2004 10:30:39 AM: > ctory base2.freestandards.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18495 > > > >Added Files: > > coreutils-i18n.patch coreutils-i18n-sort.patch > >Log Message: > >add patches to coretuils to resolve lots of i18n bugs > > Humm, I thought we weren't going to do this? > > _______________________________________________ > lsb-impl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-impl _______________________________________________ lsb-impl mailing list [email protected] http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-impl