Re: RE: [Lsb-cvslog] si/build/patches coreutils-i18n.patch, NONE, 1.1 coreutils-i18n-sort.patch, NONE, 1.1

[email protected] Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:30:57 -0400 (EDT)

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.lsb.implementation
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Marvin Heffler wrote:

> I added the patches since they are being used by the distros and it cleans
> up the si test results very nicely. It's still a good policy to avoid
> using patches that haven't been accepted by the upstream, but I would like
> to see the si have much cleaner results. We can always back out the
> patches if the consensus is that we shouldn't do it.

Consesnsus has been that we would only put these in when the upstream
accepted them.


                                Stuart

[email protected]                             Free Standards Group
Lead Developer, Written Specification                  Linux Standard Base
1024D/37A79149:                                        0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
                                                       BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149