RE: [Lsb-wg] install_initd test scripts written
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A06801158AE07847B27A52C1A074BC1D080A8F50@fmsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com> |
>Wichmann, Mats D wrote: >> (a) ask if the sysv-style initscript scheme is being used >> during the interview questions. If the answer is no, >> the whole set of tests becomes FIP. >> >Hmm, doing some error checking of install_initd & remove_initd should >still work - independent which system is used. >For instance: A depends on B >- Install A -> should fail since B is not installed >- Install B, install A -> should work since B is now installed >- Remove B -> should fail since B depends on A >- Remove A, remove B -> should work since nothing depends on A >(and then on B) >This works as reliably as using lsbinstall since that also not proof >that the right thing has been done. Thanks - good point, I think we'd missed this possibility. The dependency-related stuff should still either install or not install, even if we can't reliably check where it landed if it's a scheme we don't recognize. That's why we want to discuss these things in a public forum!!!!!