RE: [Lsb-wg] install_initd test scripts written

"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite
Message-ID <A06801158AE07847B27A52C1A074BC1D080A8F50@fmsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com>
>Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
>> (a) ask if the sysv-style initscript scheme is being used
>> during the interview questions.  If the answer is no,
>> the whole set of tests becomes FIP.
>>   
>Hmm, doing some error checking of install_initd & remove_initd should 
>still work - independent which system is used.
>For instance: A depends on B
>- Install A -> should fail since B is not installed
>- Install B, install A -> should work since B is now installed
>- Remove B -> should fail since B depends on A
>- Remove A, remove B -> should work since nothing depends on A 
>(and then on B)
>This works as reliably as using lsbinstall since that also not proof 
>that the right thing has been done.

Thanks - good point, I think we'd missed this possibility.
The dependency-related stuff should still either install or
not install, even if we can't reliably check where it landed
if it's a scheme we don't recognize. That's why we want to 
discuss these things in a public forum!!!!!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.