Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync
Demi Marie Obenour <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lvm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <YkeIb0Lq37D+OtQL@itl-email> |
Under what circumstances are DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync safe? In Qubes OS, for example, I am considering using one or both of these, but only for operations performed by qubesd. systemd-udevd will still be running, but it will be told to create no symlinks for the devices these commands create or destroy. systemd-udevd will still be in charge of other devices, however, and other lvm2 commands may run that use neither of these. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) Invisible Things Lab _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEdodNnxM2uiJZBxxxsoi1X/+cIsEFAmJHiG8ACgkQsoi1X/+c IsFY5RAAsCbqUqBeTEYlDKeZI2UeBiCqlYI4F47gZhDmlmKs8gjYQdWWPd5BTxcV 3/ql4pCFK0zDxqaTzNJBX8bGM3C6l6kEh4w40ZWYBU6gdLcdUvozIolILJSC6l85 NXn5e6LcagYTPdJNWfwoAZo9fHBPmhVHhouRveVHhpCm9msQbgQspE9A1zSX7uor 1f04HvgNdOlG4mWeyoUnGNyD67H3PrZKUf3RBtt50eIwMSTn4sTIgJ1dzbet2oWb U0DWz8569ejaCSd7IeU8kRs5egZquOsnFYdMX3qfNvkSfaE0J5obwPF0/qwBmLck W8MwHgNUJi3V864BPP/7d339k+mHfGOLQO0cr+Fw6tA8HnmAh2VsJGuSbv4KBBbO OetSfPa/D8Z9hwiGhtcJFu27AuL1hGz4msSf4+ZdT3ndLMau00RogBo5p9B/yACs miTVkeXExgz1aOf9Q9IWKdNzDPdY1gghNYYKhgMzvlyh5EmeNYAm4YgLl5I3VsSg Ai443kC43HyJzC++RLJKrW2s8lDSaCrdQhRHT8TMmJusIFF5MHLxCyNICmZYtcME CxHQKMKtY2pIP+kF7tBEyoNj93a8sqd4MB7XkeZ7edEq8nH5WWjdSL4sRxSksi0t DpaSdEaVr09YQaQU687R7gA1YXx2ydW9GvgboK+JS1Bjxazbfec= =lWaX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----