Re: Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lvm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dne 02. 04. 22 v 1:19 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a): > Under what circumstances are DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync safe? > In Qubes OS, for example, I am considering using one or both of these, > but only for operations performed by qubesd. systemd-udevd will still > be running, but it will be told to create no symlinks for the devices > these commands create or destroy. systemd-udevd will still be in charge > of other devices, however, and other lvm2 commands may run that use > neither of these. This env variable is not meant to be use on system with running udev. So it's never safe - and it's only purpose is to be able to make some progress in some critical system condition. Regards Zdenek _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/