Re: RFC: replacing mplayer with mplayer2?
Denis Koryavov <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:50:15 +0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We use mencoder in the ROSA Media Player, so it is very important to us to save original mplayer. 13.01.2012, в 17:14, Per Øyvind Karlsen написал(а): > As some might've noticed, I've done some work on mplayer & ffmpeg > packages lately, > and in the process I've also packaged the mplayer2 fork as well. > > mplayer2 works perfectly as a drop-in replacement for mplayer and has > several benefits > (see http://www.mplayer2.org/comparison.html), some of them are: > * uses ffmpeg library through it's API only, thus removing the need > for an internal ffmpeg > * as it's able to use the latest ffmpeg, it also adds support for the > multithreading it provides > * much cleaner and nicer codebase, easier to maintain and doing development on > * support for gettext translation > > It also has a couple of drawbacks as well: > * mencoder has been dropped > * internal gui has also been dropped > > As the internal gui isn't that great with several other better > alternatives and mencoder isn't that > great either (ffmpeg is a better alternative anyways, mencoder could > also still be packaged), > I'd prefer just replacing mplayer entirely rather than having both > projects maintained in the distro. > > So before I push mplayer2 to main/release, does anyone have any > objections to this? > > -- > Regards, > Per Øyvind