Re: rpmdrake typo?

Wouldn't be better something like this?

No unsatisfied dependencies.

Astelehena, 2009 Urria 19, 20:32:16-tan Thomas Backlund-(e)k idatzi zuen:
> xalba wrote:
> > 168 --> No non installed dependancy.
> >
> > dependancy --> dependency
>
> Yep.
>
> > The first word "No" means number?
>
> It is this change in rpmdrake:
>
> tell there's no new dependancy when dependancies
> list is empty (#54697)
>
>
> It should maybe be worded better...
>
> --
> Thomas