Re: rpmdrake typo?
Thomas Backlund <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
xalba wrote: > Wouldn't be better something like this? > > No unsatisfied dependencies. > I think that would be better... Thierry, what do you think about it ? > Astelehena, 2009 Urria 19, 20:32:16-tan Thomas Backlund-(e)k idatzi zuen: >> xalba wrote: >>> 168 --> No non installed dependancy. >>> >>> dependancy --> dependency >> Yep. >> >>> The first word "No" means number? >> It is this change in rpmdrake: >> >> tell there's no new dependancy when dependancies >> list is empty (#54697) >> >> >> It should maybe be worded better... >> >> -- >> Thomas > >