Re: Translations workflow
Jean-Philippe Braun <jpbraun-4qZELD6FgxhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Thu, 19 May 2011 15:33:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le jeudi 19 mai 2011 à 14:50 +0200, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit : > 2011/5/19 Jean-Philippe Braun <jpbraun-4qZELD6FgxhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>: > > Le jeudi 19 mai 2011 à 13:19 +0200, F Wolff a écrit : > >> Op Do, 2011-05-19 om 08:45 +0200 skryf Jean-Philippe Braun: > >> > > I really dont like this option, i would like to be able to comit > >> > > translations in svn and not be forced at all to use transifex, this > >> > > way i think it still needed to sync transifex with svn, so that all > >> > > changes commited in svn can be synced in transifex and vice-versa. > >> > > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > Technically it is not possible to work that way. Even if there is > >> > regular sync beetween the svn and Transifex the loss of translations > >> > risk will be high. > >> > >> Pootle is designed to work along with direct contributions to version > >> control, so it is not impossible. It is probably easier if there is just > >> one way to submit, but then you are more likely to make people unhappy. > >> Of course, I'm biased, since I'm a Pootle developer :-) > >> > >> Friedel > >> > > > > I didn't want to say that it is impossible in general, but since v1.0, > > Transifex is not designed to work with any VCS directly. There is some > > tools to pull/push files from/to Transifex that's it. Then, it's up to > > you to imagine svn or git integration... I'm sure it can be both ways > > with lot of work > > > > If some of you have some better ideas I'll be happy to hear them > > > > Actually, I don't really understand why using Transifex instead of svn > > directly is worse > > I understand the problem some people have. Until recently translating > for i18n was a lonesome job, each translator worked for himself, > checking out svn, translating, committing. Using any tool they wanted, > bei it vi, kate, kbabel, etc. Transifex is not for such people or such > a system.. Well it is. Transifex does not force you to use its web interface. If you want to work with poedit or kbabel, you can do it. Like I said on some other mail : http://help.transifex.net/user-guide/client/index.html#for-translators For me, tx pull/tx push with the command line client is the same as svn co/svn ci About the transifex-client, a package will be available soon in Mandriva 2010.X. In the meantime it can be installed with easy_install or pip > Transifex is made for collaboration of groups. Several translators of > the same language are working together in Transifex, never touching > svn. At the end of the workflow (translating, proofreading) one or > more team leaders or admins or whatever will commit the complete work > to svn. >