Re: FUD Against PLF?

Zombie Ryushu <[email protected]> Sat, 3 Sep 2011 20:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.mandrake.plf.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============0662630684==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2063260516-1315105295=:91934"

--0-2063260516-1315105295=:91934
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

My issue is that PLF applications are poorly maintained and it often does not have anything to do with 2011. Yes they contain out dated applications but that has nothing to do with 2011. The version of Flash player Plugin stable in PLF for Mandriva 2010.2 is LESS stable than that of the flash player preview. And it's still not current with what is on Adobe's site. I cannot manage RPMS in PLF as a maintainer, I tried, it was an absolute nightmare.
--0-2063260516-1315105295=:91934
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">My issue is that PLF applications are poorly maintained and it often does not have anything to do with 2011. Yes they contain out dated applications but that has nothing to do with 2011. The version of Flash player Plugin stable in PLF for Mandriva 2010.2 is LESS stable than that of the flash player preview. And it's still not current with what is on Adobe's site. I cannot manage RPMS in PLF as a maintainer, I tried, it was an absolute nightmare.<br><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><br></div></div></div></body></html>
--0-2063260516-1315105295=:91934--

--===============0662630684==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
PLF-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
--===============0662630684==--