Re: [Security-Discuss] apache exploit?
Vincent Danen <vdanen-7Aj/b8uzpy6AmYF/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.security.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jan 27, 2005, at 9:39, Jason M Temple wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are running mandrake official 10.1, with all the latest updates, as
> a web server.
>
> Apache is at apache2-common-2.0.50-7.2.101mdk.
>
> We were recently nailed by a cracker called ImFlower, who somehow
> managed to get in using the apache user, and was running elflbl to try
> and get root perms. Is the apache level above patched for all the
> recent exploits that were patched in the apache.org 2.0.52 release?
>
> Any help on this would be appreciated.
No, and because 2.0.52 fixes a security flaw that is only in 2.0.51;
see:
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.html
And since this is 2.0.50, it's not vulnerable. AFAIK, apache2 is fully
patched up. Just checked here:
http://www.apacheweek.com/features/security-20
and it looks like all of the security issues noted are fixed,
referencing by their CVE names.
Have you determined what web service he maybe got in through? It's
quite possible that he compromised a web app or CGI script to gain
access (apache is just one part of the puzzle).
--
"lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import"
{FEE30AD4 : 7F6C A60C 06C2 4811 FA1C A2BC 2EBC 5E32 FEE3 0AD4}
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B) - not displayed