Re: Huge renaming pending

m=E5ndag 18 april 2005 19.51 skrev Guillaume Rousse:
> Claudio Matsuoka wrote:
> > I think it would save a lot of hassle just left apache2 as is, the
> > majority of other distros out there do that not without a good reason.
>
> This kind of reasoning lead us to an insane situation with four
> different configuration files for apache, without reasonable
> documentation explaining why, and with even false documentation
> explaining mod_perl was run in a different proxied server. I'd really
> think we need a large clean-up there.
>
> Backward compatibility has a cost, and I feel it now overweight its
> advantages. Release notes are precisely made for explaining real
> changes, instead of just explaining gnome 2.7 has been updated to gnome
> 2.8...

So what do you propose?

=2D-=20
Regards // Oden Eriksson
Mandriva: http://www.mandriva.com
NUX: http://nux.se