Re: -x/--exact not functioning
Bart De Schuymer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network.bridge.ebtables.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 24 May 2004 01:26, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > Either I am doing something way wrong, or there is a bug in the arptables. > Neither -x or --exact yield any changes in the byte counters output. I want > to feed the output to mrtg to measure the magnitude of ARP storms induced > by my cable provider, thus exact counter values are preferred. > I don't know much C, but from looking in the source I can see that you do > not define an OPT_EXPANDED and in the cases of CMD_LIST and > CMD_LIST|CMD_ZERO you have OPT_EXPANDED commented out. Is there a reason to > this? Yes, I don't remember exactly but I bet it was laziness. Noone has complained about this up to now. I'll try to include it in the next arptables release. cheers, Bart ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click