Re: [PATCH v5 00/25] MT8189: Add support for system and base clock controllers
Brian Masney <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.clk,gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.mediatek,gmane.linux.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Aug 01, 2026 at 01:20:46PM +0200, Louis-Alexis Eyraud wrote: > .../bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8186-clock.yaml | 128 ++- > .../bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8186-fhctl.yaml | 1 + > .../bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8186-sys-clock.yaml | 24 +- > .../bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8188-clock.yaml | 93 -- > .../bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8188-sys-clock.yaml | 58 -- > .../bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8192-clock.yaml | 191 ---- > .../bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8192-sys-clock.yaml | 68 -- > .../bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8195-clock.yaml | 238 ----- > .../bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8195-sys-clock.yaml | 76 -- > drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig | 79 ++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile | 8 + > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8189-apmixedsys.c | 203 ++++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8189-bus.c | 200 ++++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8189-dbgao.c | 98 ++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8189-dvfsrc.c | 58 ++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8189-iic.c | 122 +++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8189-scp.c | 77 ++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8189-topckgen.c | 1025 ++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8189-ufs.c | 133 +++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8189-vlpcfg.c | 116 +++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8189-vlpckgen.c | 285 ++++++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8196-apmixedsys.c | 2 +- > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8196-vlpckgen.c | 2 +- > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 130 ++- > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.h | 13 +- > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c | 15 +- > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.h | 3 + > include/dt-bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8189-clk.h | 433 +++++++++ > include/dt-bindings/reset/mediatek,mt8189-resets.h | 17 + > 29 files changed, 3136 insertions(+), 760 deletions(-) I went through the rest of the series and didn't see anything new in the last half dozen or so patches beyond some deprecated headers. Just for completeness: There's still the maintainer issue that I brought up in v4 that needs to be addressed. I saw the message from Angelo about responding to that in mid September. Brian