Re: shadow fails to compile with gcc-2

On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:23 pm, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> [..]
>
> >> but understand also me: I want keep shadow code in best readable form.
> >> Current form in this area is IMO better.
> >
> > yeah, the current form is def more readable than the version the previous
> > patch changed it to
> >
> > how about this patch instead ?
>
> Better but .. it can't be only +two lines patch because I keep all code
> possibly indented (try apply your patch and run "indent newgrp.c" :)

i was going to leave such fun details to you ;)

i just wanted to see if the idea of scoping the code was acceptable to you

> I can put your previouse patch in dist tar ball in next release [1] (in
> contrib/ subdirectory) and any other version updated this patch for gcc-2
> (?).

prob would be helpful to people if you're not interested in adding scope to 
the pam code
-mike