Re: Re: [linux-sh:03284] Caclulting HZ for procps on SH based kernels

Stuart MENEFY <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:09:09 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sh.general
Organization STMicroelectronics (Bristol)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:52:49 +0100 Alex Bennee <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 16:44, Stuart MENEFY wrote:
> > Hi Alex
> > 
> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:20:27 +0100 Alex Bennee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > We've just been updating our on-board tools and compiling the latest
> > > procps (3.2.1) started getting warnings about the kernel not having an
> > > ELF note. This looks like a change in behaviour (as well as a kludgy
> > > hack).
> > > 
> > > So apart from scanning kcore for random notes is there a clean way to
> > > export HZ for SH kernels?
> > 
> > Which glibc are you using? I have a patch lying around (which is attached)
> > which I think I put in to solve this problem.
> 
> Yours ;-)

That's where your problem is!

> rpms/stm-sh4-glibc-2.2.4-3.sh4.rpm

This change went into 2.2.4-7. Updates are available on our FTP server:
  ftp://ftp.superhlinux.com/pub/linuxsh/release-1.0_pl1/updates/RPMS

> We've moved most of the packages we use to build from source however
> glibc is a bit of a monster to build to thats last on our list.

I know. I'm playing with a gcc 3.4.1/glibc 2.3.2 system at the moment,
and still don't have a set up I'm completely happy with.

Stuart
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA9p4V61BlSKQGbXkRAu48AJwICoUkxF0FaZ0IzrpnFlv2w6HyZACeIDsa
hwtPZop23idip0X0Dd/aQGs=
=C6dX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----