Re: [Printing-user-general] Why has nothing changed?
[email protected] () Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:52:43 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.printing.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.linuxprinting.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (uli wehner) writes: > > Hmmm!? > > Roger > > maybe you should try a current version of CUPS? I would venture to say that any > current distro, with a current version CUPS will simply work out of the box > without any configuration needs whatsoever. If you pair that with a supported > printer (there are literally hundreds of models), it should take you just a > couple of clicks to print successfully. I'm using Debian Etch, updated from a Debian mirror 4 days ago. My printer is fully supported (Samsung 1510) - I know that because a *previous* version of CUPS worked. Moreover, I can generate a .gdi file with Ghostscript and cat it to the printer, when it prints perfectly. So all the pieces are in place, CUPS just isn't bringing them together. I would venture to say that making unwarranted assumptions the basis of your post - as you have done - results in a message which adds nothing useful to the discussion. The information content of your post is that there exists *one* configuration of hardware and software (yours) for which the CUPS version included in *one* distro (the one you're using) works out-of-the-box. Nobody ever doubted that. This thread is about what happens when it doesn't work out-of-the-box.