Re: new year, new patches

Hi Jim,
  I've pushed those.

Now, about the old lib. Is there anything else to be done, besides
translations, that needs to happen?

 - Craig


On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 05:57, Jim Warner <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Craig,
>
> In an effort to keep the newlib project moving (ever so slowly),
> attached is a tarball of 7 patches for that branch only.
>
> The first 4 patches (0001-0004) represent changes I'd like to see
> pushed, regardless of what you decide to do with the final three patches.
>
> Those last 3 patches (0005-0007) deal with consolidating 4
> 'miscellaneous' header files into a single new 'misc.h' guy.  Since
> they're documented in a single man page, that feels more natural and
> should help future users.  But if you feel they go too far, and decide
> not to push them, I'd understand.
>
> If patches 0005-0007 are not pushed, then the #include subdirectory
> references in the current procps_misc.3 must be corrected.  And we
> probably should lose that BUGS section.
>
> We still need to update the source file copyrights and decide on the
> name for 'libproc-2'.  Maybe that should be added to:
>
>       https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/issues/170
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim
>