Re: Audio support

<[email protected]> Thu, 6 Oct 2005 14:13:41 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.pxes.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Not really. Most PXES thin clients have now 128MB RAM or more
and 100Mb/1000Mb network. Increasing the size of the image is
not a big deal. The only problem I'm concerned of if the
security implicancies of including this kind of software. But,
 even including vulnerable software, PXES image is read only
by nature.
  

---- Original message ----
>Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:04:28 -0700
>From: Ray <[email protected]>  
>Subject: Re: [pxes-devel] Audio support  
>To: [email protected]
>
>On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:41:29AM +0200, Andres Gomez Garcia
wrote:
>> I think including skype, or another H.323, SIP or IAX
softphone in the
>> PXES image wouldn't be a big problem.
>
>
>Wouldn't that require all the gui libs and other dependancies
be included as
>well?  I could see that easily doubling the size of the image
which means
>slower boot times and larger memory requirements for the
clients.  Anyway,
>if you start including client apps then this really isn't a
thin client solution
>anymore.  If you really want the client apps running locally
then you might
>be better off with a more traditional thick client but with
the root
>partition mounted via nfs.
>
>
>-- 
>Ray
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
>Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
discussions,
>and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
>_______________________________________________
>pxes-devel mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pxes-devel
Diego Torres Milano <[email protected]>
PXES Universal Linux Thin Client


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl