Re: [RFC PATCH] md/raid5: Fix UAF on IO across the reshape position

Xiao Ni <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.devel,gmane.linux.raid
Message-ID <CALTww29P_jZ-n9GMgFG0EW_N22vUsGAPJ5OGn5Lw8yfEpEoGOw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 6:58 AM Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If make_stripe_request() returns STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE,
> raid5_make_request() will free the cloned bio. But raid5_make_request()
> can call make_stripe_request() multiple times, writing to the various
> stripes. If that bio got added to the toread or towrite lists of a
> stripe disk in an earlier call to make_stripe_request(), then it's not
> safe to just free the bio if a later part of it is found to cross the
> reshape position. Doing so can lead to a UAF error, when bio_endio()
> is called on the bio for the earlier stripes.
>
> Instead, raid5_make_request() needs to wait until all parts of the bio
> have called bio_endio(). To do this, bios that cross the reshape
> position while the reshape can't make progress are flagged as needing a
> retry, and mddev tracks the number of bios needing a retry which have
> not yet completed. When raid5_make_request() has a bio that failed
> make_stripe_request() with STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE, it waits for this
> counter to reach zero. When the bio_endio() is called for the last time
> on a bio needing a retry, it decrements mddev's count of outstanding
> bios needing a retry. This guarantees that raid5_make_request() doesn't
> return until the cloned bio needing a retry for io across the reshape
> boundary is safely cleaned up.
>
> There is a simple reproducer available at [1]. Compile the kernel with
> KASAN for more useful reporting when the error is triggered (this is not
> necessary to see the bug).
>
> [1] https://gist.github.com/bmarzins/e48598824305cf2171289e47d7241fa5
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> I've tested this for regressions with the lvm2-testsuite raid tests. I
> have not run any md-specific tests on it.
>
>
>  drivers/md/md.c    | 30 +++++++++---------------------
>  drivers/md/md.h    |  5 ++++-
>  drivers/md/raid5.c |  8 +++++++-
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 3ce6f9e9d38e..5ec116b9da32 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -776,9 +776,11 @@ int mddev_init(struct mddev *mddev)
>         atomic_set(&mddev->active, 1);
>         atomic_set(&mddev->openers, 0);
>         atomic_set(&mddev->sync_seq, 0);
> +       atomic_set(&mddev->pending_retry_bios, 0);
>         spin_lock_init(&mddev->lock);
>         init_waitqueue_head(&mddev->sb_wait);
>         init_waitqueue_head(&mddev->recovery_wait);
> +       init_waitqueue_head(&mddev->retry_bios_wait);
>         mddev->reshape_position = MaxSector;
>         mddev->reshape_backwards = 0;
>         mddev->last_sync_action = ACTION_IDLE;
> @@ -9218,6 +9220,7 @@ static void md_end_clone_io(struct bio *bio)
>         struct md_io_clone *md_io_clone = bio->bi_private;
>         struct bio *orig_bio = md_io_clone->orig_bio;
>         struct mddev *mddev = md_io_clone->mddev;
> +       unsigned int must_retry = md_io_clone->must_retry;
>
>         if (bio_data_dir(orig_bio) == WRITE && md_bitmap_enabled(mddev, false))
>                 md_bitmap_end(mddev, md_io_clone);
> @@ -9229,7 +9232,11 @@ static void md_end_clone_io(struct bio *bio)
>                 bio_end_io_acct(orig_bio, md_io_clone->start_time);
>
>         bio_put(bio);
> -       bio_endio(orig_bio);
> +       if (unlikely(must_retry)) {
> +               if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mddev->pending_retry_bios))
> +                       wake_up(&mddev->retry_bios_wait);
> +       } else
> +               bio_endio(orig_bio);
>         percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io);
>  }
>
> @@ -9243,6 +9250,7 @@ static void md_clone_bio(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio **bio)
>         md_io_clone = container_of(clone, struct md_io_clone, bio_clone);
>         md_io_clone->orig_bio = *bio;
>         md_io_clone->mddev = mddev;
> +       md_io_clone->must_retry = 0;
>         if (blk_queue_io_stat(bdev->bd_disk->queue))
>                 md_io_clone->start_time = bio_start_io_acct(*bio);
>
> @@ -9265,26 +9273,6 @@ void md_account_bio(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio **bio)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_account_bio);
>
> -void md_free_cloned_bio(struct bio *bio)
> -{
> -       struct md_io_clone *md_io_clone = bio->bi_private;
> -       struct bio *orig_bio = md_io_clone->orig_bio;
> -       struct mddev *mddev = md_io_clone->mddev;
> -
> -       if (bio_data_dir(orig_bio) == WRITE && md_bitmap_enabled(mddev, false))
> -               md_bitmap_end(mddev, md_io_clone);
> -
> -       if (bio->bi_status && !orig_bio->bi_status)
> -               orig_bio->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
> -
> -       if (md_io_clone->start_time)
> -               bio_end_io_acct(orig_bio, md_io_clone->start_time);
> -
> -       bio_put(bio);
> -       percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_free_cloned_bio);
> -
>  /* md_allow_write(mddev)
>   * Calling this ensures that the array is marked 'active' so that writes
>   * may proceed without blocking.  It is important to call this before
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
> index ac84289664cd..49a231f11676 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
> @@ -626,6 +626,9 @@ struct mddev {
>
>         /* The sequence number for sync thread */
>         atomic_t sync_seq;
> +
> +       wait_queue_head_t               retry_bios_wait;
> +       atomic_t                        pending_retry_bios;
>  };
>
>  enum recovery_flags {
> @@ -877,6 +880,7 @@ struct md_io_clone {
>         sector_t        offset;
>         unsigned long   sectors;
>         enum stat_group rw;
> +       unsigned int    must_retry;
>         struct bio      bio_clone;
>  };
>
> @@ -917,7 +921,6 @@ extern void md_finish_reshape(struct mddev *mddev);
>  void md_submit_discard_bio(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev,
>                         struct bio *bio, sector_t start, sector_t size);
>  void md_account_bio(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio **bio);
> -void md_free_cloned_bio(struct bio *bio);
>
>  extern bool __must_check md_flush_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio);
>  void md_write_metadata(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev,
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index a8e8d431071b..fb78a757f2fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -6217,7 +6217,13 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
>
>         mempool_free(ctx, conf->ctx_pool);
>         if (res == STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE) {
> -               md_free_cloned_bio(bi);
> +               struct md_io_clone *md_io_clone = bi->bi_private;
> +
> +               md_io_clone->must_retry = 1;
> +               atomic_inc(&mddev->pending_retry_bios);
> +               bio_endio(bi);
> +               wait_event(mddev->retry_bios_wait,
> +                          atomic_read(&mddev->pending_retry_bios)==0);

Hi Ben

There is a problem here. The new counter pending_retry_bios above
doesn't represent the bios which have been added to stripes. So uaf
still can happen. Do we need to add a new counter? Because
md_end_clone_io is only called when all bios return. How about
something like:

md_end_clone_io
+       if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(md_io_clone->waiting_reshape))) {
+               complete(md_io_clone->reshape_completion);
+       } else {
+               bio_endio(orig_bio);
+       }

raid5_make_request:

        if (res == STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE) {
-               md_free_cloned_bio(bi);
+               struct md_io_clone *md_io_clone = bi->bi_private;
+               struct completion done;
+
+               init_completion(&done);
+               md_io_clone->reshape_completion = &done;
+               WRITE_ONCE(md_io_clone->waiting_reshape, 1);
+
+               bio_endio(bi);
+
+               wait_for_completion(&done);

Best Regards
Xiao


>                 return false;
>         }

>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.