Re: i7 working for rtai-5.0-test1.tar.bz2

Paolo Mantegazza <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.real-time.rtai
Message-ID <VI1PR06MB1471555B89A55CE93843741990B10@VI1PR06MB1471.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
It means that there have been 7 cycles that missed the deadline. Somewhat strange, since latency has aperiod of 100000 ns, which is not overtaken by a max overall latency of 32043 ns.
Let it run longer, under intense Linux load, and see what happens.
BTW, have you disabled CPU frequency scaling (CPU throttling) BIOS/Linux config?
Paolo.
________________________________________
From: Rtai [[email protected]] on behalf of Hasan Jamal [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 11:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Rtai] i7 working for rtai-5.0-test1.tar.bz2

I’ve got  latest RTAI5.0 working Linux-3.18.22. I’m wondering about overruns in latency test, are they normal?

RTD|       1339|          0|       1837|       7611|      32043|          7
RTD|        979|          0|       1818|       5484|      32043|          7
RTH|    lat min|    ovl min|    lat avg|    lat max|    ovl max|   overruns
RTD|       1414|          0|       1839|       2742|      32043|          7
RTD|        979|          0|       1819|      27438|      32043|          7
RTD|       1780|          0|       1824|      10873|      32043|          7
RTD|        974|          0|       1807|      11571|      32043|          7
RTD|       1570|          0|       1842|      10585|      32043|          7
RTD|        979|          0|       1835|      22838|      32043|          7
RTD|       1730|          0|       1814|       2773|      32043|          7
RTD|        984|          0|       1830|      16463|      32043|          7
RTD|       1720|          0|       1835|      11337|      32043|          7
RTD|        984|          0|       1822|      21159|      32043|          7
_______________________________________________
Rtai mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.rtai.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rtai
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.