Re: Re: Debina install

I have had inconsistent success using the 2.96.x compiler that ships with
RedHat 7.2 but never a single failure with 2.95.3.

I remember reading in kernel mailing list messages that it is the preferred
2.x.y version of the compiler for the kernel.

    YMMV

        Norm

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dale Stein" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:21 PM
Subject: [Rtl] Re: Debina install


> For a long time I have been unable to compile and get a successful
> regression test with
> rtlinux3.2-per3. I have used all of the kernels that were patchable with
> the rtlinux patch and nothing really worked.   So a few months ago I made
> a old lfs v3.3  on a spare partition.
> This version uses gcc 2.95.3 (which is what I used before), kernel 2.4.22
> and
> glibc-2.2.5.   The only real difference is glibc, I think, well, there are
> many others, but
> glibc and gcc are hand in hand generating the final code.
>     So I am wondering weather failed regression tests are the result of
the
> glibc version used, and not just the gcc version used?
> Dale Stein
>
>
> -- 
> Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
> _______________________________________________
> Rtl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rtl

_______________________________________________
Rtl mailing list
[email protected]
http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rtl