RE: Re: Debina install
"zl" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:46:16 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.real-time.rtlinux.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20050104184625.MTAH24088.out009.verizon.net@Saturn> |
It turns out that the installation instruction I followed wasn't complete in some sense. I found another one on the web at http://irtfweb.ifa.hawaii.edu/~ao/software/aort/rtl32-pre1/install.rh73_rtl3 .2_2419.html. It still doesn't work for 2.4.21 but at least some what working for 2.4.19. I followed all the steps except step 1 since it is RedHat specific. I got Linux and RTLinux all complied without any problem. Now the only thing missing is that RTLinux didn't make the rtsock.o. Will investigate this later. Thanks for all the help. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dale Stein Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Rtl] Re: Debina install For a long time I have been unable to compile and get a successful regression test with rtlinux3.2-per3. I have used all of the kernels that were patchable with the rtlinux patch and nothing really worked. So a few months ago I made a old lfs v3.3 on a spare partition. This version uses gcc 2.95.3 (which is what I used before), kernel 2.4.22 and glibc-2.2.5. The only real difference is glibc, I think, well, there are many others, but glibc and gcc are hand in hand generating the final code. So I am wondering weather failed regression tests are the result of the glibc version used, and not just the gcc version used? Dale Stein -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ _______________________________________________ Rtl mailing list [email protected] http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rtl _______________________________________________ Rtl mailing list [email protected] http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rtl