RE: Re: Debina install

"zl" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:46:16 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.real-time.rtlinux.general
Message-ID <20050104184625.MTAH24088.out009.verizon.net@Saturn>
It turns out that the installation instruction I followed wasn't complete in
some sense.  I found another one on the web at
http://irtfweb.ifa.hawaii.edu/~ao/software/aort/rtl32-pre1/install.rh73_rtl3
.2_2419.html.  It still doesn't work for 2.4.21 but at least some what
working for 2.4.19.  I followed all the steps except step 1 since it is
RedHat specific.  I got Linux and RTLinux all complied without any problem.
Now the only thing missing is that RTLinux didn't make the rtsock.o.  Will
investigate this later.

Thanks for all the help.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Dale Stein
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Rtl] Re: Debina install

For a long time I have been unable to compile and get a successful 
regression test with
rtlinux3.2-per3. I have used all of the kernels that were patchable with 
the rtlinux patch and nothing really worked.   So a few months ago I made 
a old lfs v3.3  on a spare partition.
This version uses gcc 2.95.3 (which is what I used before), kernel 2.4.22 
and
glibc-2.2.5.   The only real difference is glibc, I think, well, there are 
many others, but
glibc and gcc are hand in hand generating the final code.
    So I am wondering weather failed regression tests are the result of the 
glibc version used, and not just the gcc version used?
Dale Stein


-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
_______________________________________________
Rtl mailing list
[email protected]
http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rtl


_______________________________________________
Rtl mailing list
[email protected]
http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rtl