Re: array parameter bug?

On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 11:31:31PM +0800, Jun Yamog wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to ask if there is a bug in ArrayParamter.  Using a
> MultipleSelect or an ArrayParameter as a Global state param makes the
> values grow larger and larger.  I have a test code that I have written
> below to show this.  I really need this in a real world scenario.  In
> the real world I have a form that serves as a filter of the paginated
> results.  What happens is after a couple of filters the query string
> gets too long.  I have tried several work-arounds, like using hidden var
> and repopulating the multiple select. I think it boils that if the var
> is a global and array parameter.  I need it as global since external
> stuff uses the form and also so the paginator can pickup the current
> state of the filter form.  
> 
> Try the code below, you can comment out "addGlobalStateParam" and see
> that it does not happen anymore.  Is this a bug or am I not using
> MultipleSelect properly? Thanks very much.

I believe that if you have a parameter as both a global state
param /and/ assigned to a form widget, then you need to call

   m_sel.setPassIn(true)

At least I'm pretty sure this I what I used to do for one of our
search forms that needed to accept a param passed in.

Dan.
-- 
|=-             Daniel P. Berrange  -  [email protected]              -=|
|=-   Red Hat, 338 Euston Road, London, NW1 3BT.  +44 (0)7977 267 243   -=|
|=-                                                                     -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|

-- 
Redhat-ccm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-ccm-list
Archives: https://www.redhat.com/pipermail/redhat-ccm-list/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAj/ICs9/3Qn07lQURAqg4AJ9DJ3Aqo5Wxwo6okHu2BR6PMWFxEQCeJ27K
pxiDiKyGiXG8jP/gLrJgTP0=
=G7bZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----