Re: sys/systat.h and S_IFMT definition

Miloslav Trmac <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Jul 2003 19:14:44 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.redhat.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:32:35AM -0700, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> Isn't S_IFMT defined as part of POSIX and not part of the XSI extensions?
> 
>    http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/stat.h.html
See the PDF version. It surely "looks" more official, although in theory
both should be the same. The PDF version has the whole S_IFMT line
XSI-marked.
	Mirek