Re: sys/systat.h and S_IFMT definition

"Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <[email protected]> Wed, 09 Jul 2003 11:54:10 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.redhat.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

>>>>> "mt" == Miloslav Trmac <[email protected]> writes:

    mt> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:32:35AM -0700, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
    >> Isn't S_IFMT defined as part of POSIX and not part of the XSI extensions?
    >> 
    >> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/stat.h.html
    mt> See the PDF version. It surely "looks" more official, although in theory
    mt> both should be the same. The PDF version has the whole S_IFMT line
    mt> XSI-marked.

Interesting.

Is the PDF version available somewhere?

--- Vladimir

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vladimir G. Ivanovic                        http://leonora.org/~vladimir
2770 Cowper St.                                         [email protected]
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2447                                 +1 650 678 8014