Re: system-config-securitylevel and named services
Jeremy Katz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.configuration |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 05:35 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote: > Would an add/remove rather than textbox for additional services make better > sense? In which case should we have a predefined list of more well known > services, with addition of custom ports (possibly with descriptive text or > just showing both port and service name from /etc/services). That's sort of the direction the anaconda screen has moved in. I haven't quite gone to the point of adding arbitrary ones, but it's not difficult to do. > I wonder if we will want to have better "service definition" for > service publishing via howl. Eventually, yes. Jeremy -- Fedora-config-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list