Re: system-config-securitylevel and named services

On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 08:26 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Would it make better sense to stuff this into firstboot to shorten the
> number of installer screens?  I'm not sure what the rule is in terms of
> what goes into anaconda versus what goes into firstboot.  Should
> anaconda be concerned *only* with packages, while firstboot deals
> strictly with post-install configuration (adding users, firewall, clock,
> addition package sources (yum, up2date)?  Might be the case that this is
> a larger issue to be discussed at a later date.  

The place where this gets difficult is on arches like s390, s390x and
iSeries where you don't really have a head to speak of and thus
firstboot is a bit ugly to depend on.  Not sure what the right direction
for these arches is...

Jeremy


-- 
Fedora-config-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list