Re: s390x builder outage
"Michel Lind" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Maxwell,
On Sat, 22 Aug 2026, at 18:56, Maxwell G wrote:
> Thanks for the report! One question:
>
> On 8/22/26 5:27 AM, Michel Lind wrote:
>> - keeping s390x for only ELN + EPEL would definitely relieve our
>> capacity issue for now, while if we want to stop s390x being such a big
>> blocker we need at least another mainframe (so double the capacity)
>
> Keeping ELN also implies keeping all of rawhide due to how ELNBuildSync
> works. Do your numbers account for that?
Ah, no, it doesn't account for that right now. All of Rawhide, not just the packages actually built for ELN?
If we were to proceed with only keeping ELN and EPEL we might want to look into changing how the rebuild works.
--
_o) Michel Lind
_( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
README: https://michel-slm.name/
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new