Re: s390x builder outage

On Sat, Aug 22, 2026 at 5:11 PM Michel Lind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxwell,
>
>
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026, at 18:56, Maxwell G wrote:
> > Thanks for the report! One question:
> >
> > On 8/22/26 5:27 AM, Michel Lind wrote:
> >> - keeping s390x for only ELN + EPEL would definitely relieve our
> >> capacity issue for now, while if we want to stop s390x being such a big
> >> blocker we need at least another mainframe (so double the capacity)
> >
> > Keeping ELN also implies keeping all of rawhide due to how ELNBuildSync
> > works. Do your numbers account for that?
>
> Ah, no, it doesn't account for that right now. All of Rawhide, not just the packages actually built for ELN?
>
> If we were to proceed with only keeping ELN and EPEL we might want to look into changing how the rebuild works.
>

All of Rawhide is required, since anything in Rawhide can wind up in
either ELN Base or ELN Extras. And the Rawhide is the bootstrap base
too.

I don't see any value in keeping s390x around in a weird half-state
like that, though. It's a lot easier pulling the plug across the board
or expanding support for everyone.




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new