Re: Now that fc2 is retired, is there any valid yum repos?

Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy
Organization Organization? Absolutely zip.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thursday 14 September 2006 12:09, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet) 
wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Is this a desktop workstation or a server? If this is a workstation
>>> or a non-production server, why not just go with the Fedora flow? I
>>> run Fedora Core 5 on my workstation and it's working just fine.
>>>
>>> If you really don't like upgrading your OS every couple of months I'd
>>> backup my data and do a fresh install of CentOS 4.4.
>>
>> The last centos I pulled was 4.3 just a month ago, the kernel was
>> in the
>> 2.6.9.  Thats at least a year old, and ieee1394 support is broken,
>> still
>> is for that matter.  Thats one thing I do keep up with, currently
>> running
>> 2.6.18-rc7.
>
>It's an enterprise OS, so don't expect the latest versions of
>packages in the official repositories. There are extra repositories
>that do provide newer packages (centos-plus et al). And you can
>always roll your own kernel if you need too. I'd just get a base
>system that fits most of your needs.
>
>> Is it new enough that I can then build a current kernel and install
>> all of
>> kino-0.8 and its utils, or am I headed (again) for dependency hell
>> trying
>> to edit a wedding from my firewire equipt movie camera and burn a
>> vcd of
>> it?  That would be the target job for me at the moment, the rest is
>> convienience stuff.  This is the only box with a firewire card
>> installed,
>> and the rest are slower boxes.
>
>I just use CentOS for servers, so I wouldn't know how kino is doing
>on CentOS, but the things you want to do (multimedia, firewire,
>movies) sound like you'd be better off with a Fedora upgrade. Is
>something keeping you from upgrading your FC2 install to a newer
>Fedora release? FC5 has a 2.6.17 kernel and probably the latest
>versions of packages, unless you compile everything yourself anyway.

I've built a considerable amount of this system now, so I'm not allergic to 
the idea as long as the ./configure scripts can sort the dependencies.

>> I didn't know centos-4.4 was out, I may fire up azureas and nuke
>> the 4.3
>> dvd images I have now.
>
>Looking at the number of packages at http://mirror.centos.org/
>centos-4/4.4/updates/i386/RPMS/ I wouldn't bother. Just install 4.3
>and run a quick yum update to get to 4.4.

Yeah, I saw that, after I'd nuked the other 2 images and gotten the torrent 
started.  Duh, hindsight is always 20-05 you know. :(

>Nils Breunese.
>
>--
>fedora-legacy-list mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.