gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy

6953 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Re: Ircam mirror shutting down
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:36:45 +0100
Tony Molloy <[email protected]> • #6960
Ircam mirror shutting down
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:00:40 +0200
Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale <[email protected]> • #6959
Re: New packages
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:59:00 -0300
Martin Marques <[email protected]> • #6958
Re: end of Fedora Legacy mirror at Iowa State
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:22:29 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #6957
Re: New packages
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:31:04 -0400
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6956
New packages
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:11:00 -0300
Martin Marques <[email protected]> • #6955
Re: end of Fedora Legacy mirror at Iowa State
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:52:52 +0200
Nigel Henry <[email protected]> • #6954
end of Fedora Legacy mirror at Iowa State
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:28:21 -0500
"Dave Edsall - JETSETer" <[email protected]> • #6953
RE: php update for RHL73
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:11:45 +0000
"kles koe" <[email protected]> • #6952
php update for RHL73
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:00:18 +0200 (EET)
Pekka Savola <[email protected]> • #6951
Re: secnotice email address going away
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:32:43 -0600
David Eisenstein <[email protected]> • #6950
Re: secnotice email address going away
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:21:36 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6949
Re: secnotice email address going away
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:58:08 -0800
"David A. Ranch" <[email protected]> • #6948
secnotice email address going away
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:09:01 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6947
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:15:01 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6946
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:14:01 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6945
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:57:02 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6944
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:27:31 -0800
"David A. Ranch" <[email protected]> • #6943
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:11:50 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6942
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:36:42 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6941
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:35:32 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6940
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:32:34 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6939
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:29:45 -0800
"David A. Ranch" <[email protected]> • #6938
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:27:17 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6937
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:14:53 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6936
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:53:04 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6935
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:21:33 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <[email protected]> • #6934
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:16:13 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <[email protected]> • #6933
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:28:56 -0800
"David A. Ranch" <[email protected]> • #6932
Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:19:38 +0100
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> • #6931
New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project
Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:26:37 -0800
"David A. Ranch" <[email protected]> • #6930
Mirror support (Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down)
Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:38:40 -0600
"Dave Edsall - JETSETer" <[email protected]> • #6929
Re: Why all fedora core 6.90 are wrong?
Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:05:34 -0600
Aaron Konstam <[email protected]> • #6928
Re: Why all fedora core 6.90 are wrong?
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:52:00 -0800 (PST)
Curtis Doty <[email protected]> • #6927
Re: Why all fedora core 6.90 are wrong?
Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:49:56 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #6926
Why all fedora core 6.90 are wrong?
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 03:15:20 +0000
宋健能 <[email protected]> • #6925
Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:33:45 +0100
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> • #6924
Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down
Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:20:45 -0600
David Eisenstein <[email protected]> • #6923
Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down
Sun, 4 Feb 2007 22:32:42 +0100
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> • #6922
Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down
Mon, 05 Feb 2007 07:17:09 +1000
Stuart Low <[email protected]> • #6921
Re: Fedora Legacy shutting down
Sun, 4 Feb 2007 14:09:06 +0100
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> • #6920
Re: RHEL subset of which FC ?
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:57:50 -0500
Jason Edgecombe <[email protected]> • #6919
Re: 2007 DST update for RH7.2
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:04:49 -0500
Matt Temple <[email protected]> • #6918
Re: RHEL subset of which FC ?
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:37:54 -0700
Michal Jaegermann <[email protected]> • #6917
Re: RHEL subset of which FC ?
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:19:05 -0700
"Stephen John Smoogen" <[email protected]> • #6915
Re: RHEL subset of which FC ?
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:18:11 +0100
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> • #6914
Re: RHEL subset of which FC ?
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:10:47 -0300
Martin Marques <[email protected]> • #6913
Re: RHEL subset of which FC ?
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:39:27 +0100
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> • #6912
Re: [CentOS-devel] Migrating from RH9 Legacy to CentOS 3
Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:21:07 +0100
Ralph Angenendt <[email protected]> • #6910
Re: [CentOS-devel] Migrating from RH9 Legacy to CentOS 3
Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:39:01 +0100
Ralph Angenendt <[email protected]> • #6909