Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project

--===============1657482674==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart78097066.Pin2Ruk83D";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart78097066.Pin2Ruk83D
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 09 February 2007 21:57, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> > It's not being re-examined.
>
> As far as I know, it is still being examined.

Yeah, I think I need to get the final OK from the board on the 13 month thi=
ng,=20
so that we can stop saying examined.

=2D-=20
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

--nextPart78097066.Pin2Ruk83D
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFzdMp4v2HLvE71NURAvF+AKCw4/p8294mosj671V0B1+QK+v+/ACfSniH
z670/PVpnqZ6kSGKt6oympQ=
=Qvf0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart78097066.Pin2Ruk83D--


--===============1657482674==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
--===============1657482674==--