Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project

David A. Ranch wrote:
> 
>> >I would like the mirrorlist to stay if that's possible. Maybe change  
>> >it to say that there is no guarantee they are still up and serving 
>> FL  >repo's. I've already saved a local copy, so it's not really for 
>> me,  >but someone else might just find it very useful.
>>   
> Agreed and I also saved a copy too.  The problem is.. since little to no 
> effort would be going into polcing the mirrors, this mirror list will 
> probably start to reflect bad information.
> 
> Personally.. I'm still hoping that Redhat will re-fund this effort as I 
> think it's very valuable but then again, I doubt they really care that 
> much.

"Refund" assumes that Red Hat was involved in the first place. Other 
than providing infrastructure services, Fedora Legacy is completely 
volunteer based. There is already a huge amount of funding on Fedora 
from Red Hat. Asking for more would require a good business case for it. 
I doubt you can find one easily.

Rahul

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list