Re: lwn article on the death of Fedora Legacy
Matthew Miller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 08:57:31PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Matthew Miller wrote: > >>A) Kill off RHL now. Stop trying to do stuff there when we just don't > >>have > >>the man power or the volunteers. > >>B) Move to using Extras infrastructure for building packages. They're > >>ready for us for FC3 and FC4. > >So RHL has been the hold-up there? ... > That is an incorrect conclusion. You're misunderstanding me; I meant RHL has been the hold-up for switching to the Extras build infrastructure. > time. I guess one could still move the FC3/FC4 stuff to extras > (instead of just declaring the project dead) but I doubt the number of > contributors is going to rise dramatically as a result even if extras > were used. Some administrative overhead would be reduced but you'd > someone would still be needed to do the work. Agreed. -- Matthew Miller [email protected] <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list