Re: lwn article on the death of Fedora Legacy

"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Matthew Miller wrote:

> I know that personally I haven't been able to contribute the amount  
> of time
> I'd like to make this succeed. But I have a full-time job and a  
> young child,
> and am mildly active in umpteen other projects. Legacy support is  
> hard work,
> and really needs two or three full-time workers to be a success. It's
> tempting to blame the lack of volunteers, but this sort of project  
> works
> best if there's a solid base.

The Fedora Infrastructure team recently sent out an announce mail to  
let people know they could use a couple of extra hands. Already a  
couple of people mailed that team and said they could help out. Maybe  
Fedora Legacy should send out such an email?

> I think this is really unfortunate, because it makes a big gap in  
> the Fedora
> ecosystem. This will be largely filled by migration to RHEL-rebuild  
> distros
> like CentOS, which is well and good (and particularly painless from  
> the
> end-user point of few) but bad for Fedora.

I'm sorry, but I can't help you guys out here. I'm also migrating all  
our servers to CentOS. I use Fedora for my desktop system, but I just  
run the most recent release on that (no Fedora Legacy there).

Nils Breunese.

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
PGP.sig (application/pgp-signature, 186 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.