Re: lwn article on the death of Fedora Legacy
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matthew Miller wrote: > I know that personally I haven't been able to contribute the amount > of time > I'd like to make this succeed. But I have a full-time job and a > young child, > and am mildly active in umpteen other projects. Legacy support is > hard work, > and really needs two or three full-time workers to be a success. It's > tempting to blame the lack of volunteers, but this sort of project > works > best if there's a solid base. The Fedora Infrastructure team recently sent out an announce mail to let people know they could use a couple of extra hands. Already a couple of people mailed that team and said they could help out. Maybe Fedora Legacy should send out such an email? > I think this is really unfortunate, because it makes a big gap in > the Fedora > ecosystem. This will be largely filled by migration to RHEL-rebuild > distros > like CentOS, which is well and good (and particularly painless from > the > end-user point of few) but bad for Fedora. I'm sorry, but I can't help you guys out here. I'm also migrating all our servers to CentOS. I use Fedora for my desktop system, but I just run the most recent release on that (no Fedora Legacy there). Nils Breunese. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B) - not displayed