Re: lwn article on the death of Fedora Legacy

Jesse Keating <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy
Organization Red Hat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Friday 20 October 2006 10:52, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> > You're misunderstanding me; I meant RHL has been the hold-up for
> > switching to the Extras build infrastructure.
>
> Can't we somehow run the two build systems in parallel?  Use the old one
> for RHL, and test the new one out for FC releases?  That way we also get
> a good test in, and have a backup if the new build system isn't working
> right, etc.

Only if we agree to split RHL updates from Fedora updates and nothold one up 
for the other.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQBFOORb4v2HLvE71NURAoR4AJi/nYsOwKRSU4bjFTHwAmOVolo6AJ4lLvR+
+deWvbJRPj45gsNEFf117w==
=OwMG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.