Re: lwn article on the death of Fedora Legacy
"Stephen John Smoogen" <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:52:26 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/24/06, Mike McCarty <[email protected]> wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On 10/20/06, Matthew Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:36:15AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> > The problem is that we are just beat. Jesse has a kid, a release > >> > cycle, a new knee, and a lot of other stuff on his real job. The other > >> > people who have been doing stuff have also had 'stuff happen', and > >> > temporary schedule changes that have become permanent. > >> > >> Yes. > >> > >> In order to survive the project needs some real support from Red Hat. (Or > >> some other large company who wants to do Red Hat a favor, but that seems > >> even less likely.) > >> > > > >> Using the "Chasm" marketing model [*], without Legacy, Fedora is only a > >> viable solution for Early Adopters and of dubious value to the second > >> "Pragmatist" group. However, Fedora has been enough of a success that > >> many > >> Pragmatists are indeed using Fedora. > >> > > > > I would argue that the pragmatists had been using it out of a trust > > model. They had used Red Hat Linux when it has crossed the chasm, and > > I don't believe that Linux in general has crossed the chasm yet. I think > it's *all* still in the "early adopters" stage. But within the "Linux > community" (oxymoron) FC is the early adopters of the early adopters. > That would put you in the conservative column then. So far at the 3 10,000+ person companies I have worked at for the last 5 years, we have replaced 90% of our Solaris, AIX, mainframes etc with Linux. From what I have been helping with at other sites this has been the trend in the last 4 years. One site a friend works at just bought 5000 sun boxes. Although they each have a Solaris license, none of them will be using Solaris.. its just that the AMD hardware was considered better to run the clusters on. > > [snip] > > > 2) I use Fedora to alpha/beta test for the next/current Red Hat Enterprise. > > How come when I state that FC is beta test, I get dog-piled, but > you don't? > Because I said I used Fedora as a beta test.. not that Fedora is a beta test. The two are not equal statements. Red Hat may not use it as such, but I as a consumer do. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list