Re: Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Nov 2006 07:21:12 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 05:43, David Eisenstein wrote: > What say ye?? I'd say go with seamonkey. RHEL is showing us a good example. The "mozilla" codebase is dead and has been resurrected as seamonkey, so unless we want to generate our own patches (shudder) I'd highly recommend we take the RHEL route and replace mozilla with seamonkey. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFUcu54v2HLvE71NURAtN6AJ9NWhsnFy002ibfv4bay/EqaWgbGgCgkROc 6gyJdup962mRjHttJ/QZN/Q= =Rc02 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----