Re: Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]
Christopher Aillon <[email protected]> Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:34:30 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David Eisenstein wrote: > Does anyone have any comments on how you wish the Legacy Project to approach > this? I favor SeaMonkey as a Mozilla replacement, as it covers all > vulnerabilities in packages that dynamically link to the shared libraries. > But perhaps there are other ideas. I see no reason that it won't work for Fedora given that it works for RHEL. I can probably offer some guidance as there were many hurdles that I had to overcome when building these packages for RHEL, though I probably don't remember them all off the top of my head. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list